Pens/Wings Game 1 Grades
Mike Adams | Grade "A" Reviews
May 25, 12:06 PM | Hype this story!
You can’t win if you can’t score
Offense: F
And you can’t score if you put only nine (yes, count ‘em, 9) shots on goal at even strength the whole game. It was a pathetic performance. A Dupuis breakaway was really the only good chance they had the entire night. Other than that, there was no forecheck at all, and very little transition offense. Detroit’s defense is darn good, but nine shots??? The Wings just jumped them all over the ice, never allowing the Pens any time or space whatsoever. And the Pens were thoroughly unprepared to deal with this type of pressure, which was like nothing they saw against Eastern teams. The Wings allowed them no time to get into any flow with the puck. And after the first period, the Pens were always a step behind. Needless to say, this series will be over real quick if they don’t come up with a better game plan, and fast.
Defense: C
Flower was under siege much of the night. Much of it was more a result of the Pens’ inability to move the puck than poor defensive play per se. But I said before the series that I don’t like these defensive pairings against a team like Detroit. You have Whitney and Letang together, and you know Mike Babcock will try to get his top line out against them whenever possible. Then you have Gill and Scuderi, who have no speed. And they got scorched twice last night by Detroit’s third line. On the first goal, they were tired and let Mikael Samuelsson waltz into the zone, go all the way around the net, and wrap it in past Fleury. That’s what happens when you have a slow, tired pair out there. Same thing happened on the next goal, too. The two defensemen fumbled and bumbled and Fleury made a bad clear, and Samuelsson scored again. Put Letang back with Gill, and put Scuderi with Whitney so at least you have a puck mover and skater in each pair.
Power play: F
If you can pinpoint one major failure that turned the game around, it was the power play. They had three chances in a row in the first period, including one where Nick Lidstrom was off on a penalty, and they generated squat. They rarely got set up, and when they did, they failed to get good chances. Again, the Wings were all over them, allowing them no time to do anything. The first period failures totally turned the momentum to Detroit, and they kept it the rest of the game. Had the Pens scored on one of those chances, who knows how the game turns out. Then, to rub salt in the wound, they gave up a shorty late on a PP that could have gotten them back in the game. Letang lazily went back and was beaten to the puck by Dan Cleary, who backhanded it past Flower. Game, set, and match.
Penalty kill: B
They did give up a “who cares?” power play goal in the final minute, but other than that, they did a decent job. Detroit had lots of zone time, but the Pens generally kept them to the outside. The goal they gave up was right in front by Hank Zetterberg. Needless to say, that can’t happen, but the game was over at that point anyway.
Goaltending: B-
Flower made numerous brilliant saves, but was also shaky on a couple of the goals. The first one, he overcommitted at his right post, and looked like he thought Samuelsson would pass it out front. He was unable to get over to stop the wraparound. Next one, I have no idea what he was doing when he tried to pass it to Malkin in the circle. Just cover the damn puck. Malkin was not ready for the hard pass, and in the net it goes. The last two were good shots, but he should have had the rather weak backhander by Cleary.
Overall: D-
It was not a good introduction of this team to all the casual fans tuning in. I’m sure they’re saying, “what’s all the hype about? These guys aren’t very good.” I had predicted the Wings would win in seven, but after seeing the way they defended last night, it’s now Wings in five. I’ll give the Pens one on home ice, but that’s it. It was de mans against de boys last night. Only some great saves from Fleury kept this from being totally embarrassing. The Pens never really made Chris Osbad even break a sweat, which is shame. He is a subpar goalie playing behind a stellar defense. Talk about a great gig for a career scrub. But unless the Pens figure out how to get pucks on net, he’s gonna get another damn ring. Unbelievable.
And now, the rest of the story…
Evgeni Malkin: F
I called 9-1-1 after the game to put out a missing persons report on him. I hope they track him down somewhere. You don’t suppose the Russian mob kidnapped him and put Aleksey Morozov in the 71 jersey, do you? Seriously, I have to wonder if he is “nursing” an injury. For a guy to be playing so well and then just totally become invisible, you really have to wonder about an injury.
Petr Sykora: F
I think he got kidnapped with Malkin.
Hal Gill: F
Is he too slow to play against Detroit?
Marian Hossa: C
At least he seemed to be willing to muck and grind and work for some chances.
Sidney Crosby: C
He wasn’t terrible, but wasn’t at his best, either.
Doc and Edzo: A
Well, Doc was a little off his game, calling one goal that wasn’t and being caught off-guard on the Cleary goal. But how can they not seem like an A after we had to put up with Beninati and Elliot the last round?
Sergei Gonchar: A
He was by far the best Penguin last night.
Me: F
I continued wearing my vintage Ulf jersey as I have most of the playoffs. However, I failed to realize that it would provide good juju to the only Samuelsson playing in the game. Oops. But the jersey is now retired until next season.
Faceoffs: F
It was thought this would be a huge factor, and it sure was last night. They won only 31 of 66, and only 5 of 13 on the power play. Gee, and you wonder why the PP struggled?
Icehole of the Game
No play by a Wing stood out. But if I was a Detroit fan, I’d award it to Ruutu for his two-hander on Samuelsson late in the game.
Striped Buffoon Huh? Call of the Game
Shockingly, I thought Devo and O’Blindoran called a good game. The only major argument I have is the goaltender interference call on Tomas Holmstrom. I didn’t see where he impeded Fleury at all, and he was not in the crease. I’ll side with Edzo on this one and say it should have been a goal.
Monk Moment
Got to give it to Samuelsson for that first goal. I never, ever saw anything like that out of him when he played for the Pens. Runner-up goes to every single save Osbad made. No save he makes involves skill. Just luck.
A guide to the game grades can be found here.

Comments
Sean
May 25, 01:25 PM
Rule 78b: If an attacking player initiates any contact with a goalkeeper, other than incidental contact, while the goalkeeper is outside his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.
by the rules, it was a disallowed goal
Strong Black Man
May 25, 01:29 PM
Well Mr. Adams, I don’t think you’re giving Chris Osgood enough credit. He is, and always has been a very good goalie. As a starting goaltender, the man has always led his team into the playoffs, that includes his short tenure playing with a couple of horrible St. Louis Blues and New York Islander teams.
The man has 363 career wins, a career 2.43 GAA, and a .907 SV%. Those aren’t shabby numbers at all. He recently just passed the great Terry Sawchuck as the Red Wings career leader in playoff wins. I’m sure as a Penguins fan, you feel that Tom Barrasso was a good goalie… well Osgood has better numbers than him in every category. The guy gets no respect… no respect at all.
On second thought, keep underestimating him. That’ll make his potential Conn Smythe win, and his eventual induction into the Hockey Hall of Fame even sweeter.
Mike Adams
May 25, 01:53 PM
Strong Blackman,
Osbad is a product of the teams he plays behind. He has never played for a bad defensive team. No team that has him keeps him for very long because they figure they can do better. Yes, he wins, but only because he plays for the best team in the league. For the most part, you could have put a monkey in there and gotten a shutout last night.
I saw a couple weeks ago someone speculating whether Osbad was a Hall of Famer and I almost gagged. Are the standards that low? Longevity is one criteria for the Hall, and he has that. But greatness is another, and he has never been great. Never. Just being around a long time, playing behind a great team, and being a good guy are not Hall qualifications in my book.
Tom
May 25, 03:06 PM
Mike, I agree with your questioning the defensive pairing of Gill and Scuderi, both are slow, passive defenders who have little offensive skills to move the puck to the offense. They were on the ice for seven of the Fleas’ nine goals. However, I am not willing to go back to the horrible combination of Whitney and Scuderi. It was so bad that I cringed every time they took the ice. Sydor is a stiff and offers little offensively or defensively. Perhaps Gonchar / Scuderi, Gill / Letang and Whitney / Orpik??? Gonchar and Scuderi as a pair worked a bit previously.
I just watched the third goal (the shorty) again. Letang did not “lazily” return to his own end. In fact, he got back soon enough to force Cleary (the Wings’ fastest skater) to take a bad backhanded shot that Flower flubbed.
ASenk
May 25, 03:43 PM
I agree Mike, good call on them. I do believe other than an early turnover that Gonch played a hell of a game. Gill is too slow to PINCH down, but what can we bench him for? Sydor? Its moving sideways. Osgood is used to facing only 20 shots a game. If we play and shoot like the 1st period, and put 30 on him, im sure we can net 2 or 3 (give or take). The only thing i wouldve changed was the PP. We came out so strong on our first two, and had tons of chances. Unfortunatly we netted zero, but it was drawn up exactly. But the increase would be nothing more than a D[something].
Ruu played greast on the backcheck to save Gill on two occassions, but i must say he made far too many mistakes. Go Pens.
Strong Black Man
May 25, 05:39 PM
If Osgood is so terrible, please explain his success while playing in St. Louis and in Long Island. He had to play amazing last night during the onslaught of pressure the Penguins bestowed upon him during their back-to-back-to-back power play opportunities. Those are saves he’s been making his entire career, but many overlook them because of the couple of poor goals he allowed some 10 years ago.
I’m sorry, but the logic you use just doesn’t cut it. Name a great Hall of Fame goaltender that wasn’t playing behind a strong team. Patrick Roy? He played for some amazing Canadian and Colorado teams. Martin Brodeur? He’s been playing behind some of the best defensive systems the NHL has ever seen. Ken Dryden? Tony Esposito? Grant Fuhr? Ed Belfour? Come on. Almost every goaltender that has been labeled great also had a great team behind him.
Look at some of the other goaltenders that have come and gone through Detroit over the years. The highly touted Curtis Joseph couldn’t get it done in Detroit while they featured a line-up consisting of 7 players that had scored 500 goals in their careers. Manny Legace, Bob Essensa, Tim Cheveldae. Those are the names of goalies that can be considered subpar, or career scrubs.
Commenting is closed for this article.