The Mid-Season Report Card
Mike Adams | Report Cards
Jan 7, 11:46 AM | Hype this story!
We have reached the end of the first half of the season, so it’s time to evaluate how each Penguin player has performed thus far. These grades are done against expectations so that we’re not rating, say, Jarkko Ruutu on the same scale as Sidney Crosby. The grades are a reflection of how each player has fulfilled his role/potential so far.
Forwards
Colby Armstrong: C. He has played extremely well since being reunited with Sid. But we can’t forget that he was also a regular healthy scratch in the early going due to his indifferent play.
Erik Christensen: D. I expected more out of him, especially scoring-wise. He has started to come around recently, exhibiting a never-before-seen physicality that bodes well for his improvement in the second half.
Sidney Crosby: C-. He is slightly behind last year’s scoring pace, and has not developed a true goal-scoring ability yet. Needs a true scoring winger to fully tap his potential.
Adam Hall: C. He’s been exactly what he was expected to be—a penalty killer and fourth-liner.
Connor James: Incomplete. Connor, we barely knew ye.
Tyler Kennedy: A. I don’t think anyone really expected him to have this much success this quickly. Has never been a real prolific offensive player at any level, but is chipping in with key goals for the Pens.
Georges Laraque: A. After his less-than-impressive play in last year’s playoffs, expectations were exceedingly low. But he has played well, and not only in the pugilist role. His forecheck ability has been superb and will be important come playoff time.
Evgeni Malkin: C. Another player who has not progressed much since last year. He is only very slightly ahead of last year’s pace in goals and assists. I had thought his second year would bring a big jump, a la Sid last year.
Ryan Malone: B. While he likely won’t ever be the offensive force we thought he might become, he has become a valuable player because of his new-found dedication and hard work. If nothing else, he is an excellent third-liner and penalty killer, as long as he accepts the role.
Gary Roberts: C. He started to fall out of favor with some, but those people fail to realize that no player can play a kamikaze style, like Roberts does late in the year, for an entire season. He was playing very well before he broke his leg.
Jarkko Ruutu: D. Last few games aside, he has been a huge disappointment and is likely in his last few months as a Penguin. The coaching staff seems to have no confidence in him.
Jordan Staal: F. While I am not shocked at his goal-scoring drought, I am surprised at how huge the falloff has been. While other aspects of his play have not necessarily fallen off, he simply must be more productive offensively if he is to justify the lofty draft pick used on him.
Petr Sykora: C. Start fast and then disappear has been his modus operandi. This year appears to be no exception.
Jeff Taffe: Incomplete. Haven’t really seen enough of him on which to make a judgment, though he appears to be a decent fourth-liner.
Maxime Talbot: A. He just seems to keep advancing as a player. Right before he was hurt, it looked like he’d get a chance on the second line. It would have been interesting to see if he could handle it.
Defensemen
Mark Eaton: A. He came back from his injury problems and was playing extremely well until he got hurt again. It will be a tough decision on whether to resign him over the summer, due to the injury issues.
Sergei Gonchar: B. Has done what he always does offensively, that is, rack up power play points. But his play in his own end has been better this year, too. Of course, expectations in this regard are about as low as you can get, so playing above them is relatively easy. But he did it.
Kristopher Letang: B. Oddly, he has been better defensively than I anticipated, but has not shown much offensively. This is likely because The Genius is keeping the reigns on him. But he is here to stay.
Alain Nasreddine: Incomplete. Very incomplete.
Brooks Orpik: D. It is now becoming clearer that this guy is a wasted first-round pick. The coaching staff has no confidence in him because of his continued poor decision-making, both with and without the puck. When a defenseman is incapable of playing either on the power play or on the penalty kill, what value does he have?
Rob Scuderi: A. Boy, the remaining half of the former whipping boy Scudichar tandem has really played far beyond expectations this year. He has been solid night in and night out. He has rarely been noticed, which is the best thing you can say about a defensive defenseman.
Darryl Sydor: C. This would have been an F at the quarter pole, but he is back to being that calm, veteran blue line presence that the Pens thought they were getting.
Ryan Whitney: D. His offense has dropped off some as teams have shut down that back door power play move that worked so well last year. He has also been unsteady in his own end, though he has improved recently.
Goalies
Ty Conklin: A. A complete no-brainer here. Easily the most pleasant surprise of the first half. His puck-handling ability has been a godsend to the defensemen. More importantly, he is basically stopping everything that comes his way. He is a great comeback story.
Marc-Andre Fleury: D. While he had started to play well prior to getting hurt, his season overall is a huge disappointment. His play was so bad that The Genius took to benching him in favor of Dany Sabourin. He continues to allow far too many rebounds and still hasn’t figured out how to play the puck outside the crease. Doubts are starting to creep in about his ability to live up to the hype.
Dany Sabourin: C. He has been exactly what most thought he would be—a guy who can play a game here or there, but who was not capable of filling in on a long-term basis. He played well in spot starts, but was only one step above abysmal after Fleury went down.
Management (now, these grades are base don performance, not expectations).
Michel Therrien: C. There have been ups and downs, but he has kept the team together and has them playing well. He stayed with Mark Recchi for too long. His power play is an embarrassment for one with so much talent on it. The penalty kill has been wildly inconsistent. But he has the team ahead of last year’s pace, so, overall, he is doing at least a decent job.
Ray Shero: C. The team’s two glaring holes last season are its two glaring holes this season. They lacked a goal-scoring winger and a shutdown defenseman. They still do. His offseason acquisitions have been adequate, though nothing more. He won on Conklin, lost with Sabourin. His patience is a virtue, but at some point he is going to have to make a bold move.





Comments
henkegbgskea
Jan 8, 04:58 AM
I dont understand your grading at all….
If u read it its sounds that we are dead last in the league….
I mean Crosby a C ?
Malkin a c ?
I could go on and on but i stop there :)
I dont know what expextations u have on the team this year.
Its always hard to follow up a succesive year….
Many teams have proven that like the
Ducks,Hurricanes,Rangers and so on.
A team who always seem to be in the top are the Devils.
It took a long time for Senators to get where they are today.
I feel we could give the guys a little time
a little patience ?
Rremember its wasnt long time ago we seem
to have no future stars….
now we have so i say pls have some patience
Guys like Fleury,Whitney,Letang,Staal,Malkin,Crosby
and a bunch of the other guys will give us a team to be proud of its take a little time thats all.
Finally i say bye and thank u .
If u have read all the way to here … :=)
DaBich
Jan 8, 07:41 AM
Henke, did you change your name a bit? Good to see you again :)
henkegbgskea
Jan 8, 08:46 AM
Hi Dabich
=) yes i did …
Good to see u too .
Matt Bodenschatz
Jan 8, 09:30 AM
Henke, I think you missed the fundamental point of the grades: they were determined based on expectations. A “C” grade means that player has met expectations, but not exceeded them. So anything higher than a “C” is a player doing better than expected, while anything below a “C” is a player not living up to expectations.
Obviously, Crosby is graded on higher expectations than Malkin, who is graded on higher expectations than Sykora, etc etc.
Most players are playing to the level most expected — therefore, there are a lot of “C” grades.
mjp1542
Jan 8, 09:50 AM
A “C” is not performing up to expectations. If you get a C in school, you are only achieving at a 70-75 percent level. If you think guys like Crosby and Malkin are only achieving to 70-75 percent of their ability, I think you are sorely mistaken. And 48 points at the midpole, anyone whose expectations were higher didn’t watch the playoff series last year. This is a good team, but not yet great. Soon, it will be, but not yet.
Matt Bodenschatz
Jan 8, 12:07 PM
MJP, if you don’t like the ABCDF scale, then go with a +, even, – scale. A “C” on Adams’ scale is saying the player is even, or playing at a level expected, not above, not below.
I think we’ve agreed on the evaluation, now we’re just haggling over the aesthetics — which I feel to be fine. The scale was outlined in full prior to getting into the grades.
A – performing well beyond expectations
B – performing beyond expectations
C – performing to expectations
D – not living up to expectations
F – severely underachieving
DaBich
Jan 8, 03:48 PM
Hey, I’m a blonde and I can follow the grades. I’m sure you guys can too, if you get out of tunnel vision mode ;)
Phil
Jan 9, 03:00 AM
The problem with only grading based on expectations with a team this young is that, in most cases, there is little data for comparison. How much of a jump is expected out of a bunch of guys in their early-20’s, especially within a half-season?
That being said, I feel a lot of these grades are pretty accurate, especially Talbot. I’ve been talking up Talbot for years, but he really is exceeding expectations. The guy just has a knack for the game.
My main disagreements lie with:
Orpik – Has no offensive talent, sure, but he’s really only the physical presence on defense. Gonchar and Eaton worked fine together, but I can’t tell you how nervous they made me whenever a big guy camped out in front of the net, ‘cause we know he wasn’t going anywhere. How does Orpik’s “D” compare to Scuderi’s “A?” Throwing out expectations, would you say Scuderi has had the better season?
Whitney – Again, a little harsh. Opponents were going to figure out the backdoor play eventually. He’s not nearly on his points pace of last year, but that doesn’t mean he’s completely lost all effectiveness as an NHL defenseman. He’s still tied for fifth on the team in points. And he’s still only 24 years old.
Adam Hall – I would have went with an “F” here. The guy’s not really good at anything, including penalty killing. The most you can say about him is he “applies moderate pressure.” Doesn’t have the pest game, middling skill or surprising shootout ability of Ruutu, and thus, should be a routine healthy scratch.
Crosby – The kid can still be streaky in the goal-scoring department, but come on. Where would this team be without him?
On another note, this is the first time I’ve visited this blog. Good stuff.
DaBich
Jan 9, 11:08 AM
Phil, I’ll have to disagree with you on one of your points. WHITNEY. He constantly gives the puck away, too often, in his own zone. I’ll admit that his ineffectiveness on the PP is because of coach’s mishandling. You have to put a player in the correct position for him to succeed.
Matt Bodenschatz
Jan 9, 12:08 PM
Phil, I disagree about Orpik and Scuderi. In my opinion, Scuderi is more valuable than Orpik. He’s not physical, but he doesn’t have to be because he’s positionally smart.
Orpik too often runs around and botches his coverage, thus resulting in scoring chances. Scuderi isn’t flashy, but he’s safe.
I’d take sound positional defensemen over thumpers who run around any day of the week.
DaBich
Jan 9, 03:37 PM
Matt, you’re right on the mark about Scuds. He’s been even more “consistent” lately too, which has been good for the team in filling in for Eaton. Scuds is definitely better than Orpik.
Commenting is closed for this article.