Prospect Profile: Simon Despres, Philip Samuelsson
Jesse Marshall | NHL Entry Draft
Jun 29, 01:23 PM | Hype this story!
#1 Pick – #30 Overall – Simon Despres – D – Saint John (QMJHL)
We had Despres ranked at #17 in Faceoff-Factor’s official top 30 for the NHL entry draft, so it goes without saying that him falling to #30 could without a doubt be considered a steal.
The first thing one notices about Simon Despres on the ice is his size. At 6’4, 205lbs, Despres is a hulking monster compared to many of his peers. He clocked in a 205, but his playing weight has been listed anywhere from 200 – 220 pounds.
That said, don’t think that Despres is your proto-typical Hal Gill-ish defenseman. Despres can skate, and that skating ability compounded with his size is what makes ranks him so high in many draft rankings.
Despres can also handle the puck better than most defenseman of his stature. His shot is nothing to write home about, but he can deliver the puck to forwards effectively and get the puck out of trouble.
Alex Grant was able to put up some monster points in Saint John as a direct result of Despres hanging back and giving him a solid presence on the defensive blueline.
So why, taking all this into account, did Simon Despres fall to #30 overall?
I think we need to take two things into account here.
First off, the selection of Calvin de Haan by the New York Islanders set off a chain reaction of teams taking guys that they had specifically liked or targeted, sending Nick Leddy to Minnesota early, along with Dylan Olsen and Phillippe Paradis after that, two players that were debatable first round choices before the draft began. These selections knocked Despres down a few pegs, enabling him to fall further and further down the line.
However, there are some red flags with Despres that may have played a factor in a few teams passing over him in the first round.
He didn’t have a particularly good World Junior experience and his performance in the President’s Cup playoff in the QMJHL left a lot to be desired.
The knock here is that Despres doesn’t use his frame enough or adapt well to a physical and up-tempo environment. His decision making can be come suspect and his ability to properly read the play comes into question quite often. Simon seems to drown a bit when the going gets tough.
For Despres, it’s a trip back to Saint John next year sans his partner Alex Grant, where he will have the opportunity to implement his physical presence onto the ice in a more consistent manner, in addition to honing his mental faculties and preparing to step to the next level.
#2 Pick – #61 Overall – Philip Samuelsson – D – Chicago Steel (USHL)
The Penguins have made a habit out of selecting the lesser-known partner of a hyped defenseman in the NHL draft.
It started several years ago when the Penguins selected Kristopher Letang, who was paired with the late Luc Bourdon in Val d’Or. Last year, it continued when the Penguins selected Nick D’Agostino in the 7th round, who was the partner of the New Jersey Devils #52 overall selection, Brandon Burlon.
This year, the Penguins did it yet again, selecting Philip Samuelsson, who was the partner of the #21 overall selection in this year’s draft, John Moore.
The son of former Penguins bruiser Ulf Samuelsson, Philip isn’t as nasty as his father is, but he is a very solid defensive defenseman.
If I could liken this pick to another selection the Penguins have made in the last few years, I would say it is very much akin to the Brian Strait selection.
Strait, who is on the verge of signing an entry level deal with the Penguins to leave Boston University and come to the AHL, reminds me of Samuelsson in many ways.
Philip is very raw, but is very smart, and extremely solid in his own net.
He isn’t the best skater ever, but his long reach enables him to poke the puck off the stick of opposing forwards without getting stuck in a footrace.
Philip’s strengths are board work, smarts, and a commitment to protecting the front of his own net and bruising anyone that is screening the goaltender. Wearing the old man’s number five, Philip is a far cry from what Ulf was, but exhibits the understanding of the game and the willingness to make the opposition pay the price for coming into high traffic areas with the puck.
Philip isn’t totally devoid of puck handling abilities, either. His 22 assists this year exhibit his ability to remain calm with the puck and avoid turnovers in his own zone.
Philip had quite a bit of hype at the beginning of the year, and started the season floating around just outside the ISS top 30 in October. However, playing in the USHL behind John Moore, it was difficult for him to keep that hype about him, and he fell right into the Penguins lap.
This is a no frills pick. Philip has a long way to go in his development, and he’ll receive some great input from the staff at Boston College, but it could be worth the wait.
Stay tuned for more profiles of this year’s draft class, including my personal favorite selection of this year, Ben Hanowski.





Comments
Pens1967
Jun 29, 03:25 PM
Jesse, I read that Despres played with a hip injury during at least the end of the season. That was partly why his performance in the QMJHL playoffs and international competition left a bit to be desired.
DS
Jun 29, 03:38 PM
Or, perhaps looking to cover their bets in the case of Grant and Despres, take both partners in a defensive pairing! :)
And the money quote from Phil Samuelsson via his old man:
“He doesn’t play as physical as I did,” said Ulf Samuelsson, now an assistant coach for the Phoenix Coyotes. “He watched old tapes of me and he said, ‘You go into a corner and you either killed someone or you missed them – I go in there every time and I take the puck.’ So he’s a little different.”
TIM
Jun 29, 05:57 PM
I think as far as Samuelsson goes BC is an amazing hockey school, and he could learn a lot. I really liked the Despres pick from what I had heard about him overall. He was rated highly, and Shero has apparently said they were going to trade up for him so they saw a lot in him as well. I have heard his QJMHL team isn’t very good so is that an issue Jesse with his development? Are you going to preview our 3rd round pick?
Andrew Rothey
Jun 29, 08:29 PM
I take no issue with the selection of Despres at #30. He was almost universally rated higher than that draft slot, suggesting the Penguins got good value. Large defensemen who can skate and handle the puck also come at premium. I saw a video of him skating and he has a very effortless and graceful stride, particularly for a man his size.
While the pick lacks flash and excitement, it certainly supplements the Penguins several high flying offensive defensemen of smaller stature (notably Letang and Goligoski) once Despres develops. Despres figures to develop into a No. 2-3 defensive defensemen. If he can add a physical element, his upside improves considerably.
What I simply cannot understand is why the Penguins did not select a goal-scoring winger in the first round. While I generally support the theory of selecting the best player regardless of position, few teams have a core of players locked up long-term like the Penguins do. The weaknesses in their roster (read: scoring wingers) will very likely be a weakness that the team will continue to face for the next half dozen years. Under the Penguins circumstances, I feel they should have keyed on 2 or 3 wingers likely to go in the bottom half of the first round and either traded up or waited at 30 to select one of them.
I love the Hanowski pick, kid has ridiculous numbers and serious offensive upside, particularly if his skating can improve. But everyone knows the biggest obstacle in moving the Penguins forward is furnishing their unmatched stable of young centers with talented wingers to maximize their talent.
The realities of the cap system and the cost of retaining the Penguins’ core players precludes Ray Shero from making the much-ballyhooed UFA signings that get so much press and internet fodder. While a revolving door of veterans has been the modus operandi for the team so far, the Penguins clearly need a steady flow of cheap, young, and talented wingers coming up through the system. These wingers on entry level contracts or whose negotiating power is diminished until they reach their UFA years will be a key element to the dynasty so many Pens fans envision over the next half-decade.
While the trading of the struggling Ryan Whitney received much press for bringing in Chris Kunitz to play with Sid, it was made just as much to acquire Eric Tangradi. A very talented power forward prospect who fits all the criteria I listed above. It was a brilliant trade by Shero.
While I do not take issue with the selection of Despres specifically, it makes little sense to me why the team did not make drafting a top winger in Round 1 the top priority in this draft.
TIM
Jun 29, 09:11 PM
Andrew I too like the Hanowski pick, kid could have a solid upside. As for your gripes with the picks I do see where people are coming from. The big issue is drafting apparent need, and BPA. It seems to me Despres was the BPA and Shero had intentions of drafting him, possible trading up for him. Any Winger drafted, and not in the top 10 picks wouldn’t be with the team for at least 2-4 years. If you draft the best player at the time you have an asset you believe in to eventually make the team or be traded. If we draft a winger next year (hopefully number 30 again), I don’t see a huge issue with drafting a winger next season. It is hard to say what The Pens will do in the future. I know there are a few kids (Tangradi, CPZ, Johnson etc.) who are going to have to get a shot at it.
Commenting is closed for this article.