Hypocritical Flyers Look For Something, Anything To Get An Edge
Matt Bodenschatz | National Hockey League
May 13, 08:22 AM | Hype this story!
On December 3, 2007, I wrote a story about Riley Cote’s three-game suspension for his elbow to the head of Dallas Stars rookie defenseman Matt Niskanen.
Cote become the fifth Philadelphia Flyer skater to be suspended in the first half of the season, prompting NHL officials and Commissioner Gary Bettman to issue a stern warning to the organization known for its on-ice antics and pugilism.
The team response issued by general manager Paul Holmgrem: “Obviously, we’re under watch, I guess. Whether it’s fair or not it’s out there. We need to take a look at it and discuss it and we will.”
So when the Flyers cried foul over an elbow to Daniel Briere’s head handed out by Evgeni Malkin, it was hypocrisy at its best.
Then, when word broke on HockeyBuzz.com that the Flyers have contacted the NHL seeking suspension for Malkin, it became a joke.
According to HockeyBuzz writer Eklund, “The Flyers ask league to look at Malkin hit on Briere last night. The hit happened away from the play and along the near boards to me last night, but I talked to a few people today who said they felt it should have been a match penalty.”
While I certainly agree that the hit was uncalled for and, at the very least, was worth a penalty — if not a brief suspension — I find it quite ironic that the undisputed dirtiest team in the NHL is looking for some sort of break by the officials.
When a player or team has the reputation of playing dirty, the calls often don’t go in their favor.
Jarkko Ruutu can attest to this. After falling to the ground as a result of a punch to the face during Sunday’s game, Ruutu was issued an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty for diving. Had he been any other player, it likely would have resulted in a Penguin power play.
But Ruutu knows his agitator role won’t serve as a foundation for solid relationships with the referees, and as a result, he doesn’t complain when a call doesn’t go his way.
Even Penguins coach Michel Therrien understands that not every call is made, especially when the benefit of the doubt has not been earned.
“You know, I read some comments about John Stevens, about how he’s disappointed about some calls,” Therrien said in an interview at Kukla’s Korner. “But at the same time, we’re disappointed about some calls as well. Jarkko Ruutu got punched in the face, by Hartnell, we should have been a five-on-three, and that could have been a turning point in the game. We didn’t get those calls. So that’s playoffs. There are times you’re going to get a call, there’s times you’re not going to get a call.
“It’s not about complaining. It’s about playing the game. You hope to get the calls. It doesn’t happen all the time, and what are you going to do?” ... “There is time he spent time in the penalty box, I don’t know why. Like yesterday he got punched twice, and he spent some time in the box and it’s not his fault. So what are you going to do?
“You’ve got to move on, and hopefully if he keeps playing the same way, he’ll get rewarded. But it’s not about complaining. They’re complaining. We could complain as well.”
Daniel Briere’s reponse to the whole ordeal:
“I’ve never considered myself a superstar,” Briere said to the Canadien Press, according to TSN.ca. “Obviously, they might get protected a little bit more. That’s understandable, but when they do some of the cheap shots that they’re doing I think it would be fair for everybody that they get the same treatment in that regard.”
When it all boils down, what we are seeing is two teams in polar opposite states.
The Penguins are in prime position to take a commanding 3-0 lead in the Eastern Conference Finals and have lost just one game so far in the playoffs, leaving their confidence sky high.
They don’t need to question the officiating or play mind games with the opponent to get motivated for games.
Conversely, the Flyers are two games from elimination and, without their top two defensemen, their chances of advancing grow slimmer by the minute.
They are grasping at straws, searching for something, anything to give them a physical or mental edge against the more talented Penguins.
This is the sign of a desperate team that knows its fate.
Watching the Flyers squirm off the ice is nearly as fun as it watching them squirm on the ice.


Comments
DaBich
May 13, 09:48 AM
LOL....“here lizard, lizard, lizard”
I love seeing the Cryers squirm ;)
Great write-up, Matt.
I didn’t see the elbow. Not even in replays. But if they start reviewing EVERYthing that goes on, the Flyers won’t have anyone left on the ice to play hockey!
Phil
May 13, 12:29 PM
I saw the elbow. I’m not sure it was as harsh as Briere made it seem, but what do I know? An elbow is an elbow, and they suspended BGL for an elbow (albiet a way more obvious elbow) so why not Geno?
Same reason Pronger was able to play in the playoffs after stepping on someone. The league needs its stars. Sorry, but in the regular season Geno gets a game there. And I’m not sure I’d protest it.
DaBich
May 13, 03:17 PM
Phil, I wouldn’t protest it either. I do however, have a problem with Philly crying about it. Total hypocrasy!
Ben Schmidt
May 13, 03:46 PM
I really think the Flyers should be careful about asking the League to review the series very closely with an eye for suspensions. They may discover that the Pens aren’t the only ones who have gotten away with some rather significant “extracurricular activity”.
Then again, considering what happened when Bryan Murray and Tom Renney tried complaining about the officiating to the media, maybe I should be glad that they’re complaining. It seems that the team that complains more seems to end up getting more penalties called against them, not less, after all.
Rhiana
May 14, 08:04 AM
This brings memories back to the press conference following Sunday’s game, when they asked Crosby what he felt about the Flyer’s coach saying that the stars on the penguins team are getting favorable treatment by the refs and Crosby just rolled his eyes and said “To be honest with you, I have no comment.” (In the meantime, Crosby got a goal taken from him.)
That is the way I feel about the Flyers and all of their complaining. Let them complain all they want but they aren’t going to be the ones winning the Stanley Cup.
Matt Bodenschatz
May 14, 08:54 AM
Rhiana! You have graced us with your presence again! That response was classic, wasn’t it?
The Senators complained about the officiating and lost. The Rangers complained about the officiating and lost. The Flyers are complaining about the officiating and are losing. Trent? I think so.
The refs don’t like to be made to look like fools, and that’s what the Flyers are doing. Whether it’s right or not, the Flyers are angering the refs into making some bad calls that favor the Penguins. Keep your mouth shut Mr. Stevens and crew and you might get a call or two — although, as you said, Rhiana, Crosby’s goal was taken back, which clearly favored the Flyers.
DaBich
May 14, 10:58 AM
Hey, it’s Rhiana! You tell ‘em girl =D
Commenting is closed for this article.