The Voice of Dissent (Or Reason?)
Mike Adams | Pittsburgh Penguins
Apr 25, 10:10 AM | Hype this story!
In looking at the picks of the Faceoff Factor writers for Round 2, I noticed something very odd. Each and every one of them picked the Pens over the Rangers. Well, except for one lone wolf—yours truly. Am I out to lunch, or is everyone else a homer? We’ll know the answer to that in a couple weeks. But for now, let me explain why I picked the Rangers in this series.
First, let me state that I am not doing it just to rile up all you Penguin fans out there. I can do that plenty well with the game grades. And I am not doing it just to be contrary. I didn’t even know who everyone else had picked when I made my selection. No, I am doing it because I honestly think the Rangers are the one team in the East that could beat the Penguins. I have felt this way long before the playoffs even started, and nothing that has happened thus far has caused me to change my mind. Let’s go area by area and look at who stacks up the best, starting with the most important one.
Goaltending
The Rangers have King Henrik Lundqvist; the Pens counter with Marc-Andre Fleury. In Round 1, both were dazzling. By the numbers, Fleury had the better of it in save percentage (.955 to .917). But Lundqvist faced the far more difficult task. New Jersey at least put forth an honest effort against the Rangers. The same cannot be said for Ottawa against Fleury. Lundqvist has performed superbly against the Pens this year, compiling a .914 save percentage against the dangerous Penguin offense. He was especially stingy on home ice, allowing only 5 goals on 92 shots. For whatever reason, the Pens seem to have had a problem figuring out Lundqvist. Meanwhile, Fleury was even better against the Rangers, with a .929 save percentage.
Advantage: EVEN
Team Offense
The Pens were 7th in the league, the Rangers a disappointing 25th. However, the Rangers outscored the Pens 21-16 in the season series. They averaged only 2.5 goals a game. They have spread their offensive talent out over three lines, while the Pens concentrate theirs on the top two lines (unless Jordan Staal miraculously finds a scoring touch to boost the third line). But there can be no doubt that the Pens do have more offensive firepower than the Rangers, especially with the Hossa acquisition.
Advantage: PENGUINS
Team Defense
Conversely, the Rangers have become the Devils of the late 2000s under Tom Renney. They trap and trap and trap some more, until they frustrate you and force you into mistakes at the bluelines. They were fourth in the league defensively, allowing only 2.32 goals per game. The trapping style covers up a suspect corps of defensemen that is led by Michal Rozsival. The Pens have become a much more solid defensive team under Michel Therrien, and jumped all the way to tenth in this category this season. They have been solid down the stretch. The trade for the USS Hal Gill has really stabilized the pairings.
Advantage: RANGERS
Special Teams
If you just look at the rankings, you’d have to call it about even. On the power play, the Pens were 4th, the Rangers 22nd. Conversely, on the penalty kill, the Pens were 23rd, the Rangers 6th. Again, it’s Penguin offense versus Ranger defense. In the season series, the Rangers won out. Their power play clicked at 21.4 percent against the Pens, while the Pens scored on only 14.3 percent of their man advantage chances against New York.
Advantage: RANGERS
Coaching
While Ray Shero acquired the USS Hal Gill to play against guys like Jaromir Jagr, Therrien has indicated no particular preference for doing so. He seems to prefer Brooks Orpik and Sergei Gonchar to play against the Rangers’ top guns. This could be a huge tactical blunder. It would seem to make more sense to let Gill play against Jagr and not wear Gonchar out playing defense. Renney has also indicated no particular desire to match lines, so Therrien could gain an advantage if he so chooses. But he is not a line-matcher either.
Advantage: EVEN
Intangibles
This is where I think the Rangers have an edge. They have all that Cup-winning experience with guys like Chris Drury, Scott Gomez, Brendan Shanahan, and Jagr. They dealt with at least a little adversity by losing a game to the Devils. The Pens experienced only a moment of adversity when they let a three-goal lead slip away in Game 2, before recovering to win late. But the waltz against the disinterested Senators probably wasn’t enough to prepare them for the onslaught the Rangers will provide.
Advantage: RANGERS
Prediction
I think the experience makes the difference in this matchup of two pretty even teams. I have long thought the Rangers would come out of the East, and I’m not changing that now just because they’re playing the Penguins. I hope I’m wrong, but RANGERS IN 6.

Comments
Jonathan Farzalo
Apr 25, 10:35 AM
i can easily see how someone would pick the Rags in this series…so don’t think you’re crazy for doing so. but don’t think we are all homers for picking the Pens. In my opinion, it’s a pretty dead-even series. I was on the fence for my pick, though I want the Pens to win, and in the end, decided the only thing that pushes it over the edge for me is Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin. But it’s a see-saw for me….I can see anyone picking the Rangers…unlike with the Pens/Ottawa series, were I’d call anyone who took Ottawa insane!
Matt Bodenschatz
Apr 25, 10:38 AM
Jon, I’m with you. This series is so even that there is a valid argument for picking either team to advance. As you said, when it comes down to it, this team has two of the top 5 players in the NHL, and I just see a desire to win from the Penguins that I haven’t seen in a long, long time. It will be a difficult series, but I see the Penguins advancing.
Head Coach Michel Therrien
Apr 25, 10:40 AM
Mike,
I ‘ope you are wrong too.
I tink you may be over estimate de soundness of de Ranger defensemen. Der performance over de season was spektackular, however, de Devils did not, in my mine, present formidible offensive attack.
De Penguin also ‘ave de intangible dat you mention. We ‘ave de Sykora an’ de Roberts, both know what de playoff is about. Also, you speak of adversity? Adversity? Tink about dat.
What team has not overcome adversity to be at dis point in de playoff? Our player have overcome a lot to be where de are. Marc-Andre go down, Crosby go down, Roberts go down, but we find way to win game. Our player step up to every challenge de face. Dis serie’ will be no different.
De player will come to play, bringing de grit, passion, and will to win. We ‘ave de perfec’ recipe for success. Focus. Discipline. Sacrifice.
Also, I tink you may ‘ave to alter one of de even you have above. Dat is all I say.
Who is afraid of de Renney,
Michel
Chad
Apr 25, 10:47 AM
While I disagree with what you say, I’ll defend to the death your right to say it.
Justin Maffei
Apr 25, 11:45 AM
The Pens penalty kill was also astounding in the Ottawa series. The additions of Hossa, Dupuis, and Gill have seriously improved the PK. I’d call it a wash on Special Teams, perhaps even a slight edge to the Pens.
Ben Schmidt
Apr 25, 12:24 PM
I’ll chime in to say I’m in the same camp as Jon and Matt.
This series looks so even on paper that one has to go with one’s gut to make the call on which team will advance.
Personally, I think that when the Pens play their best, they can beat anyone. So I chose to believe that they’d play their best for this series. That’s a pure gut call, because I think this series could easily go either way.
Tom
Apr 25, 01:15 PM
Mike, One factor that seems to be forgotten is age. Although the Rangers’ stars have more experience, they also have alot of mileage. The Pens’ stars are young, fast and in good shape. I believe that if they play hard and fast they may wear the Rangers down. Puffnuts, Straka and Shanahan are over the hill and Avery, if handled right, can be obliterated from his desired position in the crease. Play them fast and tough and they will tire easily. At this time of year, young legs beat old.
ejt
Apr 25, 01:25 PM
a lot of people are bringing up the season series, and while it’s true that the Pens were outplayed by the rags, the Pens are a much different team now than in the regular season with the deadline additions. The Pens also lost the season series to the sens. that said, this series does worry me.
Ashley Gallant
Apr 25, 01:59 PM
I think we should learn from Montreal and just forget about what happened in the season series. It’s a whole new game now, and the Pens have a (relatively) healthy team for the first time all season.
I’m with everyone in that this series is pretty much even and it will be a hard-fought series. In fact, I think whichever team comes out of this series will win the conference finals. I chose the Pens because of the reasons previously stated: youth and two number 1 lines. I think the chances of the Penguins advancing improve if they (a) play a fast, hard-hitting game to try to wear down the aging veteran Rangers players and (b) ignore Avery.
DaBich
Apr 25, 07:52 PM
It’s the end of the second. If we lose this game, I’m coming after ya Mike!
;)
DaBich
Apr 26, 11:51 AM
Ahhh, I’m glad I don’t have to go “Mike Adams” hunting ;)
Commenting is closed for this article.