Because You Asked
Mike Adams | Pittsburgh Penguins
Aug 14, 11:01 AM | Hype this story!
This week, we poll our writers on a question submitted by John in Pittsburgh:
Where do you see Jordan Staal fitting in the Penguins’ lineup?
First up is Mike Wilson:
Excellent question! I was just talking about this to someone the other day. If Jordan Staal wants to make a name for himself in the NHL (which he does), he’s going to have to realize that he is not a Crosby/Ovechkin-like player. In Staal’s favor, however, if I were a 2nd overall draft pick, I’d be a little disappointed at being a third-line center as well. So where do we put him you ask? The big 11 will have to fill in where the big 12 and big 10 used to be.
A big-bodied guy like Staal isn’t going to be making a living for himself by winning skills competitions, being the team’s superstar, and making the girl’s hearts melt (though I hear some ladies love him). If Staal wants to be on the top two lines and maybe a powerplay, he needs to use that strapping Ontario farm country frame of his and get traffic to the net, redirect some shots, and learn how to be a little more physical.
Jesse Marshall kind of agrees
As a matter of pure opinion, I’d want to see Jordan Staal playing the wing on a line with Evgeni Malkin and Petr Sykora. Let’s not forget that Staal and Malkin showed quite a bit of chemistry two years ago during their rookie campaigns. What allows me to move Staal out of a third line defensive role is the emergence of Max Talbot as a competent two-way player. If Staal moves up, and you place Miro Satan and Ruslan Fedotenko with Sidney Crosby, that leaves a probable third line of Pascal Dupuis, Max Talbot and Tyler Kennedy. That line is not only apt at back-checking and defensive play, but they instantly become one of the better energy lines in the East. Staal is ready to be placed in a position to score. It’s time to give him the chance. Forget what impact a breakthrough year could have on his contract negotiations, we need to get the maximum potential out of him now.
Matt Bodenschatz is on the same page
Jordan Staal is a tricky situation. If he comes into camp looking like the player who netted 29 goals in his rookie season, it’s safe to say he’ll best serve the team in a top-two line winger capacity. But if he looks like the snake-bitten sophomore slumper (offensively) of last season, there’s no question that he should be on the third line.
Word broke this summer that Staal was unhappy as a third liner and would not sign a contract at this point because of it. That’s a convenient rumor that really doesn’t fit the player. What seems more logical is that Staal is unhappy with his performance from 2007-08 and realizes he’d be signing a contract without any leverage. Waiting until next summer is smarter for him, as he might be able to improve his statistics and, thus, increase his contract.
The way I see it, if Staal is to be a long-term Penguin, he must be a winger. He’s not, and never will be, good enough to unseat Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin, making him no better than third line center. His defensive game suits him as a third liner, and his faceoff stats improved drastically in the playoffs, but if his offense comes around he must be moved into a scoring role.
At this point, basing this prediction on his playoff performance and on comments made by Ray Shero that Staal will take over Ryan Malone’s role, I would pencil Staal into the second line left wing role, with Fedotenko, Dupuis and Pesonen fighting for the first line left wing role. Basically, what I am saying is, I think the plan is for Staal to play on Malkin’s wing and, while he must earn such a promotion, it essentially is his to lose.
As is Eric Politowski
I can see Jordan Staal in two places in the Penguins line-up this year. One – remain the 3rd line center from last year, and put up 15 goals. Two – play on the first line as a left wing, with Sidney Crosby and Miroslav Satan, and put up 30 goals.
Justin Maffei sees it a bit differently
Most likely Staal will get a look at being either Crosby or Malkin’s
LW. Whether he stays there depends upon his production. If he is the rookie version of Jordan Staal, he will stick on one of those lines. However, if he is last year’s version, then he will be relegated to third line duty. Staal sticking as a first or second line LW would not be ideal. The Penguins would prefer not to lose Staal’s defense in the middle, but Staal has expressed disappointment at being a third liner. It would be interesting to see Staal centering a line flanked by Malkin and Sykora, but it would be a surprise if the coaches gave that idea much thought.
Kyle Dreibelbies joins the majority
When talking about where MT will put him, nobody can predict. However, I would like to see him play at 2nd line LW. This would leave a top line of Fedotenko-Crosby-Satan. A 2nd line of Staal-Malkin-Sykora would allow a line 1 and 1a. Realistically, though, if an extension can’t be reached, I think a trade is very possible this summer.
And, as for the moderator of this (egad, see what he’s done to me). And, as for me…
I also side with the majority, for several reasons.
First, I am not sure his talents are suited for a center role. Yes, he is very strong defensively. But he really has little true offensive instinct other than shooting. He is a terrible passer. He sees the ice much better defensively than he does offensively.
Next, I think the Pens have a bigger need for a top 6 winger than they do for a third line center. Staal thrived in that role two years ago, then slumped offensively last year while playing center. If he can adapt to playing on the wing, that gives you a good top-level winger at a pretty reasonable salary if they sign him. It’s easier to find a cheap third-line center than it is to find a cheap top winger.
Finally, it will give us a chance to figure out which Staal we will see—the one with the incredible 22.1% shooting percentage in his rookie year, or the one who couldn’t buy a goal last season. I would bet on something in between. In other words, if he gets as many shots as he did last year, and has a reasonable shooting percentage, look for 25 to 30 goals if he gets to play with Malkin or Crosby on a regular basis. And don’t forget, he will definitely get more power play time with Ryan Malone gone. He’s really the only “wide-body” option they have.





Comments
Pens1967
Aug 14, 12:45 PM
While I’m not opposed to seeing Staal as LW with Malkin, I think I’d rather see him with Crosby. IMHO Sid needs some continuity with at least one winger. Crosby really hasn’t anyone, maybe Armstrong, with whom he could develop long term chemistry. Staal is perfect for a center like Sid who’s more of a playmaker than scorer. Staal’s also the big body to go into the corners and cycle the puck.
Fedo, I think, could work better with Malkin. They will have some commonality both coming from the former Soviet Union. That also should make communication among Malkin and Sykora easier.
Dabich
Aug 14, 10:48 PM
All I know is, Staal had better do SOEMTHING, as we need him to fill a bigger role than he did last season. I’m thinking he’s up for it.
Matt Bodenschatz
Aug 14, 10:58 PM
Let’s be realistic, though, Dabich. We’re still talking about a player at an age most don’t even consider the NHL an option. His rookie season raised the bar so high that anything short of offensive improvement would be considered a failure.
His offense was far from good last year, but he also wasn’t relied upon as an offensive contributor. I liken this to the Letang situation. We all know Letang has offensive skills, but instead of going all out in the offensive zone, he focused on defense. Sure, Staal’s focus seemed to be more out of a lack of production than a coach’s mandate, but I think the year in a defensive center’s role has drastically improved his overall game — which is evidenced by the monster playoffs he had.
I think he is now ready to move into a new role — the one he had in his rookie season only because he forced his way into it. Now he’s not forcing, but easing — and that should bode much better for the long haul.
The One and Only Surge
Aug 15, 12:29 AM
Pens1967, while I don’t like the idea of Stall with Sid, (mainly because it failed at the start of the season last year) I do think what you said makes sense. Well as far as the second line goes. Look at it this way, you basically will have a line that speaks the same language. Thats pretty good considering Malkin is still not speaking fluent English. I would still like to see Pesonen be the surprise and force Fedotenko back to the third line. Feds could use that to tone his defensive game and would still probably try to put up some nice numbers considering he is looking for a contract come next season. Man I can’t wait for this season to start.
Pens1967
Aug 15, 02:05 AM
Matt, I think Pesonen can only play with Sid. Malkin and Sykora need a big LW who can go to the corners and to the net. If it’s not Staal, then it has to be Fedo.
Matt Bodenschatz
Aug 15, 10:18 AM
Surge, I think Malkin’s English is much more fluent than the fans are privy to. I’ve seen and heard several things that allude to this. The most prominent being a video shot where he was joking with teammates and talking in English, then when he saw the camera, he turned into shy, non-fluent Malkin who needed a translator at his side. His English wasn’t a problem last year with Malone, and it wasn’t a problem his rookie season with Staal. I think that aspect is extremely overrated.
I tend to agree with you that I like Staal better with Malkin than Crosby, as I think he just lends himself more to being successful on Malkin’s wing. Why? I’m not sure — but I also take literally Shero’s comments that Staal will step in to fill Malone’s shoes.
As for Pesonen and Fedotenko, here are my thoughts:
Pesonen seems to have a ton of skill, an ability to find open spaces and bury the puck with his quick shot. I wonder, though, if he’ll be able to avoid contact as much in the smaller North American rinks than the larger Finnish rinks? I’m not saying he’s soft or tries to avoid contact, but that he needs to do so in order to get open. I think he’ll start out either as a third liner or in the AHL until he adjusts to the North American game — then we might see him slip into a scoring line role.
Fedotenko, to me, is a finished product. What you see is what you get. Putting him on the third line likely won’t make him better defensively, just like putting him on a scoring line won’t make him better offensively. And, remember, he was looking for a contract last season and didn’t exactly have a standout season. I look for 45 points out of him, with 20-25 of those being goals. I also expect him to be a top-two liner — at least until Pesonen forces his was in (if, in fact, he does so). Like Pens1967 said, they need his big frame in front of the net.
It’s great to see the reader discussion picking up, again. It’s been a dull few weeks, but hopefully we’re on the upswing!
Rick is wrong
Aug 17, 12:42 PM
Justin Maffei,
You state, “Staal has expressed disappointment at being a third liner.” Really? When did he say that? What is your source?
I am tired of people speculating complete malarkey.
Matt Bodenschatz
Aug 18, 09:48 AM
Rick, I think he is basing his argument on the article from just after the playoffs that indicated such a rift.
Commenting is closed for this article.